It is currently Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:19 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Career track decision tool
PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 7:47 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:21 pm
Posts: 24
Which Career Track is Right for You?
Click the seal
Image

Additional information from Devex

Quote:
"There's a lot of misconception out there about some of the career tracks that we have," said Luis Arreaga, director of the State Department's Office of Recruitment, Examination and Employment.

Here's a quick rundown for budding development professionals seeking employment in U.S. government:

Economic:

Broadly speaking, economic officers work to promote trade and development policies favorable to U.S. interests. According to one economic officer, people with development backgrounds are usually drawn to this track, as they are the most familiar with the complex economic issues facing developing nations.

Robert Dry, a senior foreign service officer, said one trait that is critical to succeeding as an economic officer is versatility. The work of an economic officer often entails an especially wide range of projects and responsibilities, he noted. For instance, in working for the Foreign Commercial Service, an economic officer often acts as a liaison for any U.S. government agency that foreigners need to contact for business purposes. Dry's own career highlights in the economic track include working with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the National Science Foundation, combating mango blight in Oman and helping to organize disaster relief aid in the wake of the 1999 floods in Vietnam.

Management:

Management officers focus less on foreign policy and more on the day-to-day operations of running an embassy, from human resources to procurement. According to Arreaga, the management track may be particularly attractive to those with master's degrees in business administration and/or experience administering development projects:

"Think of a corporation that has 280+ offices worldwide," he said. "Think about the infrastructure that you need to support that."

By offering training in foreign languages and cross-cultural communication, the management track allows diplomats to develop business skills that are in high demand but harder to come by in the private sector.

Management officers tend to rise through the ranks the most quickly, according to Arreaga.

Public Diplomacy:

As the name implies, public diplomacy officers work to promote a positive image of the United States to the general public. This position often involves interacting with the local press, writing speeches, and issuing statements about U.S. foreign policy. But public diplomacy officers are more than spokespersons; they often get involved in efforts that may directly appeal to development professionals, such as coordinating cultural exchanges and scholarship programs. Some embassies' public affairs offices directly run grant programs, such as the Democracy Commission small grants which promote independent media, government transparency, and the rule of law.

Consular:

Consular officers handle many of the embassy functions that outsiders are most familiar with: assisting American citizens abroad and issuing visas to prospective visitors to the U.S. According to State Department recruiters, the consular track has got a bad rap. Maybe it's because new diplomats are compelled to spend a year doing consular work during one of their first two tours of duty, or perhaps it's because the crowded waiting room with staff shielded behind bullet-proof glass windows is a little too reminiscent of the Department of Motor Vehicles.

In any case, the consular track is the least competitive but, according to Arreaga, this does not mean it's the least interesting. Consular officers may end up visiting U.S. citizens in prisons abroad, tracking down parents who have fled the U.S. to avoid child support payments, and coordinating adoptions from far-flung orphanages. Consular officers have the most direct interaction with the local population, Arreaga noted: They often have the best stories to tell and are able to "get the pulse of the country" more quickly than other diplomats.

Deborah Graze, chief of outreach and coordinator of the U.S. Diplomats in Residence program, stressed that issuing visas is a serious responsibility since consular officers are legally enshrined as the main gatekeepers determining who should be allowed to enter the country. Another diplomat observed that junior officers in the consular track usually end up with substantial management responsibilities, as they are often called upon to oversee local staff who process visa requests.

Political:

This track is by far the most competitive, fueled in part by the rumor that political officers have the best shot at becoming ambassador. (Arreaga emphatically stressed there's no data to prove this.) Political officers deal in statecraft, reporting back to Washington on trends within the governments and societies of their post. Back in Washington, political officers often serve on a country desk, the office responsible for handling each bilateral relationship at the State Department headquarters. International relations junkies may be particularly drawn to the political track, though it seems fair to say that these officers are less directly engaged in development than those following another employment track at State.



Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Career track decision tool
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 5:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:46 pm
Posts: 10
90% match to the management cone, are the different tracks similarly competitive? Is the test the same for each cone?


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Career track decision tool
PostPosted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 7:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:03 pm
Posts: 9
SteveHanson wrote:
90% match to the management cone, are the different tracks similarly competitive? Is the test the same for each cone?

1. Competitiveness in the five career tracks changes periodically, based on State's hiring needs. The political track seems to be almost always oversubscribed, while the management track is undersubscribed. In other words, your 90% match is lucky, as it directs you to a track where new officers are needed.
2. The tests (written and oral) are the same for all five career tracks.

_________________
A dream becomes a goal when action is taken toward its achievement.
A rejection is nothing more than a necessary step in the pursuit of success. (Bo Bennett)


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Career track decision tool
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 3:58 pm
Posts: 5
Cone: Management
Status: Passed FSWE
What about standards in the QEP...does anyone have any indication - anecdotal or otherwise - as to whether the QEP takes into account which cone you select and/or your qualifications FOR THAT CONE.

In my case, I have management experience and chose the management cone....wonder if that will help.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Career track decision tool
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:41 am
Posts: 179
Location: Houston
Cone: Private
Status: Passed FSWE
blingem wrote:
What about standards in the QEP...does anyone have any indication - anecdotal or otherwise - as to whether the QEP takes into account which cone you select and/or your qualifications FOR THAT CONE.

In my case, I have management experience and chose the management cone....wonder if that will help.


I think it does - anecdotally at least here is what I noticed. I recently did not pass QEP for public diplomacy.

I know other people who seemed no more or less qualified (even some who scored lower on the FSOT) and the one difference in our background seemed to be that they had done some public affairs type of work. My background is very corporate but I do have military experience, speak an obscure but important language, degree from a good school, 10+ years of international living, coaching sports teams, volunteer work and other leadership roles.

Really the only hole in my resume that I can come up with is a lack of PA or PR type work.

_________________
Support the forum by shopping the FSOT Forums Amazon Store for test materials.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Career track decision tool
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:34 am
Posts: 13
Cone: Consular
Status: Passed FSWE
So, when we originally registered we took the test that says which one we most match to. Is there any way to double check which track we placed into, or what what point do we have to "single-mind" our track?


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Career track decision tool
PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:41 am
Posts: 179
Location: Houston
Cone: Private
Status: Passed FSWE
When you fill out the registration for the FSOT online it will ask you to choose a cone and it will have a reminder noting that this is an irreversible decision.

_________________
Support the forum by shopping the FSOT Forums Amazon Store for test materials.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Career track decision tool
PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:42 am
Posts: 19
I always thought this Career Track decision tool was about as useful as one of those quizzes on Facebook...Haha.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  


drupal hit counter